Missing the trick

IT’S a fine vision, isn’t it? A world where poor and drug-addicted women aren’t bought and sold for sex; a world where prostitution has been eradicated.
This is the kind of Utopia Jim Coleman, the depute leader of Glasgow City Council, wants for Scotland. And, like all good missionaries, he isn’t just preaching about it, he’s out there trying to make it a reality. Last week, he launched End Prostitut

ion Now – a campaign to make the buying of sex in any circumstance illegal.

While kerb-crawling was, in fact, outlawed in 2007, Coleman wants to see more offenders prosecuted, with tougher penalties for the convicted. And he wants the law to be extended to the buying of sexual services in brothels and massage parlours.

On an ideological level it is hard to argue with the End Prostitution Now campaign, which has the support of Strathclyde Police. Whatever the apologists for the sex industry might pretend, the vast majority of prostitutes are not willing participants in a commercial transaction but vulnerable young women for whom prostitution is a survival strategy rather than a choice. The move to place the burden of guilt on the client is also theoretically sound. Why shouldn’t those who exploit the desperate be made to pay the penalty?

Yet deep down we all know that what Coleman wants is not achievable. Wherever there is demand and money to be made there will be supply. Be it alcohol, drugs or abortion, cracking down on a lucrative trade merely drives it underground.

Supporters of Coleman’s cause say this is nonsense: they point out that slavery was a lucrative trade and has been abolished. But that is a false analogy, because, once slavery was made illegal and the law enforced, there was no motive for the victims to collude in it (whereas, with prostitution, the money that changes hands may be enough to secure a girl’s next fix and therefore her complicity). Slavery, in any case, does still exist even in the UK, with immigrants trafficked by gangmasters into forced labour. Furthermore, the idea that making it illegal to buy something will somehow cut off demand flies in the face of experience, particularly in Glasgow, with its entrenched heroin problem.

Far from ending prostitution, changing the law may force sex workers out of sight of the authorities, thus placing them in greater danger. If they have to conduct their business by mobile phone or the internet and work from their own flats it will be even more difficult to protect them. Sex workers have told Coleman this; harm reduction campaigners have told Coleman this. But he doesn’t want to listen because he has placed his faith in the Swedish experience.

So often has the depute leader held up the Nordic country – which outlawed the buying of sex in 1999 – as a template for all European countries that its success in tackling prostitution has taken on the aura of established fact. In reality, the effect changing the law has had in Sweden – which in any case had a relatively small sex industry – is far from clear. The government’s claims that there has been a 50 per cent decrease in the number of prostitutes and a 75 per cent decrease in the men who have bought sex in that time are fiercely disputed by those who claim it is now impossible to keep track of the problem.

Admittedly the move does seem to have had an impact on human trafficking; making it illegal to buy sex makes Sweden a less attractive proposition for those dealing in prostitutes. And it has taken it off the streets: Stockholm’s red light district is tiny compared to those of most European capitals.

But those who work with prostitutes in Sweden say 90 per cent of its sex industry is now mobile, making it more difficult to regulate. And that far from changing their attitudes towards buying sex, Swedish men are now travelling to Denmark, where more brothels have opened up to cater for the rise in demand.

Ironically – given that the Swedish initiative was driven by its commitment to women’s rights and that selling sex there is legal – there is little in the way of support, such as the handing out of condoms, for those women still plying their trade in the country. It is almost as if – by recognising their human rights – the government feels it has done as much as it needs to do to protect its prostitutes.

So if banning the buying of sex won’t help, what will? Well, in Scotland, while Glasgow was busy trying to eradicate prostitution, Edinburgh decided to take the harm reduction route. During the 20 years the city operated an unofficial tolerance zone in Leith there was a decrease in the number of attacks on prostitutes, in the number of under-age street workers and in prostitution-related HIV transmission rates. Police were able to limit the number of girls working at any one time and outreach workers could provide health advice.

Edinburgh was also the first local authority effectively to decriminalise brothels by licensing “saunas” and turning a blind eye to what went on inside in them. It took this stance because it believed prostitutes working outdoors were twice as likely to suffer violent attacks than those working indoors – and by and large it worked.

Campaigners say changing the law on kerb-crawling has driven prostitutes from their traditional haunts to less safe areas of the city – there were 100 attacks on prostitutes in the capital last year compared to 11 in 2001. Cracking down on the buying of sex in brothels is likely to have the same negative impact. No, sanctioning a trade that deals in human misery is not ideal. But surely it’s better than driving the problem underground and then pretending that it no longer exists.

source: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/comment/Dani-Garavelli-Missing-the-trick.5907444.jp

Published in: on December 18, 2009 at 9:43 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

Answering the Door During the Holidays

Beware of Strangers

Criminals take advantage of the holiday season to prey on those who are unsuspecting and generous. Be careful when someone you do not know comes to your door during the holiday season.

The holiday season is a time when busy people can become careless and vulnerable to theft and other holiday crime. The following tips from the Los Angeles Police Department Crime Prevention Section can help you be more careful, prepared and aware during the holiday season.

* Be aware that criminals sometimes pose as couriers delivering gifts.

* It is not uncommon for criminals to take advantage of the generosity of people during the holiday season by soliciting donations door-to-door for charitable causes although no charity is involved.

* Ask for their identification, and find out how the donated funds will be used. If you are not satisfied, do not donate.

* Donate to a recognized charitable organization.

Source: LAPD Crime Prevention Section

Holiday Home Safety
Keep Your Home Safe

Don’t let the rush and excitement of the holiday season make you careless in protecting your home from potential criminals.

The holiday season is a time when busy people can become careless and vulnerable to theft and other holiday crime. The following tips from the Los Angeles Police Department Crime Prevention Section can help you be more careful, prepared and aware during the holiday season.

* Be extra cautious about locking doors and windows when you leave the house, even for a few minutes.

* When leaving home for an extended time, have a neighbor or family member watch your house and pick up your newspapers and mail.

* Indoor and outdoor lights should be on an automatic timer.

* Leave a radio or television on so the house looks and sounds occupied.

* Large displays of holiday gifts should not be visible through the windows and doors of your home.

* When setting up a Christmas tree or other holiday display, make sure doors and passageways are clear inside your home.

* Be sure your Christmas tree is mounted on a sturdy base so children, elderly persons or family pets cannot pull it over on themselves.

* If you use lights on your Christmas tree ensure the wiring is not damaged or frayed. Frayed or damaged wiring can cause a fire.

* Place your Christmas tree in water or wet sand to keep it green.

* Never place wrapping paper in your fireplace.

Source: LAPD Crime Prevention Section

Published in: on December 16, 2009 at 9:25 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

Court reporting plans could threaten children’s privacy


Vulnerable children’s privacy will be put at risk by government plans to relax media reporting of family courts, according to a critical Oxford University report.

The Children, Schools and Families Bill, which is awaiting its second reading in Parliament, plans to allow the media to report details of individual cases and name expert witnesses.

Although the bill pledges to keep children’s identities secret, the Nuffield Foundation-funded briefing paper The Media and the Family Courts – Key Information and Questions about the Children, Schools and Families Bill, says that the bill “lacks sufficient clarity” surrounding privacy.

Report co-author Robert George says: “Under these changes we could see very personal details of vulnerable children and adults published in local and national newspapers and online.

“Journalists will not be able to name children and families, but that will not necessarily prevent them from being identified.”

The report also urges the government to consider alternative ways of opening up family courts to greater public scrutiny. This includes waiting for the findings of a pilot launched this year to make anonymised family court judgements readily available to the public.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said that the bill and the anonymised judgements pilot “address different policy goals”.

He added: “The information pilots provide easily accessible anonymised records of decisions made in family court cases, which will be available for the public, media and parties to view. Allowing greater reporting of family cases where a media representative is in attendance will allow the media to scrutinise court processes on the public’s behalf in the interests of transparency and public accountability.”

source: http://www.cypnow.co.uk/bulletins/Daily-Bulletin/news/971714/?DCMP=EMC-DailyBulletin

Published in: on December 4, 2009 at 7:46 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

Novel Taps in to Current Climate of Increased Human Trafficking

Human trafficking is not a problem relegated to other parts of the world; in fact, it occurs in the United States every day in suburban neighborhoods and urban streets fueled by a sex-on-demand society. Xulon Press author Megan Whitson Lee’s new release, All That Is Right and Holy (paperback), focuses on the damaging consequences of pornography and its dangerous link to prostitution and sex trafficking, and the painful ripple effects of sexual addiction, the bonds of which can only be broken through God’s redemptive and healing power.

Says Lee, “The novel is highly relevant to the current climate of increased trafficking in persons due to demand. According to the State Department’s 2007 Trafficking in Persons report, more than 800,000 people are trafficked yearly across international borders. Current economic conditions across the globe elevate the incidences of sex trafficking. Desperate circumstances render women vulnerable to those in the market of exploitation and selling sex.

The author–who holds a Master of Fine Arts in creative writing and a Bachelor of Arts in music from George Mason University–has done extensive reading and research on sex trafficking, sex addiction, and the dire effects of both on society as a whole. It is her hope that this book will help American society to see how both of these issues destroy lives and families and relegate people to the status of commodities.

Xulon Press, a division of Salem Communications, is the world’s largest Christian publisher, with more than 7,000 titles published to date. Retailers may order All That Is Right and Holy through Ingram Book Company and/or Spring Arbor Book Distributors. All That Is Right and Holy is available online through xulonpress.com/bookstore, amazon.com, and barnesandnoble.com.

source: http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/novel-taps-in-to-current-climate-of-increased-human-trafficking,1070411.shtml

Paedophiles are trafficking runaways, says charity

Thousands of children are being sexually exploited by organised paedophiles, a charity warned today.

Barnardo’s warned of a “hidden” problem in which vulnerable youngsters, many of whom have run away from home, are preyed upon by men while on the streets.

The paedophiles befriend the children, offering them gifts and food, and then persuade the youngsters to have sex with them.

The children are often trafficked between towns and cities where other paedophiles will sexually abuse them, a Barnardo’s report, Whose Child Now?, revealed today.

The organisation said more than 1,000 children in London alone had been sexually exploited, but said it did not know the full extent of the problem nationwide.

Martin Narey, chief executive of Barnardo’s, said: “We alone have worked with over 1,000 children who’ve been sexually exploited in just 20 of the 209 local authorities.

“We don’t know the true extent of this problem. But we know, however hidden from the public eye it might be, it affects many thousands of children.

“We shouldn’t have to do this work. But men are not going to stop the predatory sexual abuse of girls and sometimes boys. We shall not stop trying to thwart such men and help their victims escape from their clutches.”

Mr Narey said he was shocked after spending time with the workers helping the children.

He told the BBC: “I was horrified by the vulnerability of children who should be in a caring supportive environment who were alone and isolated.

“And when they are alone and isolated, they are picked up by these men who appear to be nice and kind to them at first, ultimately to make them have sex for paltry sums of money.”

The paedophiles typically target children who have run away from home and are isolated on the streets.

Mr Narey explained: “One of the trigger points seems to be children who are going missing.

“There are 100,000 children a year who go missing in the UK. Most of them go home after a few days, but my workers in this area say the children who repeatedly go missing perhaps may sleep rough on the streets, perhaps (their parents) may be complacent about children going missing for the third or fourth time, that’s the point at which they are vulnerable.

“An apparently kind man will buy them food, will buy them drink and give then a mobile phone, and then a few months later they will be isolated and alone, sometimes in a different town and sleeping with that man and his friends.”

He added that one in six of the sexually exploited children was moved from town to town to increase their isolation.

No national records are kept on the number of children exploited in this way.

Barnardo’s is calling for police and authorities across the UK to develop a greater awareness of the problem.

Mr Narey added: “We would be delighted to work with more local authorities and put some of our money into this and to provide the shelter for these children and get them off the streets. We know we can do that, we can succeed.”

source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/paedophiles-are-trafficking-runaways-says-charity-1821971.html

Slavery’s New Face

Christy Elngwe
It May Not Look Like ‘Roots.’ But Thousands Share The Defining Traits Of Slaves Through The Ages: They Are Not Paid, And They Cannot Leave

Christi Elangwe must have dazzled the human-resources department at Kmart with her brilliant smile and invincible humor–they hired her on the spot, and she started work just before Thanksgiving. “I’m the greeter,” the 23-year-old says enthusiastically over popcorn shrimp at a Shoney’s restaurant near Washington, D.C. She has opened her first bank account and is finally saving for college. Pride is evident in the staccato of her Cameroonian accent: “It’s my first job.”

“It’s your first job for which you’re paid,” corrects her lawyer, Steve Smitson, who is sitting across from her.

That reminder snapped Elangwe back to a time, less than a year ago, when she says she was enduring unspeakable cruelty in one of America’s wealthiest suburbs. Inside a $284,000 Germantown town house, 20 miles from the White House, Elangwe was, literally, a slave, according to court papers filed Nov. 29. For most of her five years there, she was forbidden from using the telephone, prevented from venturing into the front yard without an escort and prohibited from talking to anybody who might have crossed her path, even on family outings to church. She was kept so tightly under wraps, few of her neighbors knew she existed.

Inside the house, she says, her chores began at 6:30 a.m. and ended only once Daniel Acha-Morfaw, his wife, Vivian Satia, and their three children were in bed; she worked 16 hours a day, seven days a week, for almost 1,800 days on end. If she had been earning minimum wage, well below the going rate for live-in nannies, her accumulated salary might have reached $175,000, says her attorney. But she was never paid.

Slavery is alive in America again. Today’s slaves may not be bought, sold or tortured in the public square, like those in “Roots” or “Amistad,” but experts with the Protection Project, an anti-trafficking program at Johns Hopkins University, estimate that 1 million undocumented immigrants are currently trapped here in slavelike conditions. (By way of comparison, perhaps 6 million Africans were shipped here between 1502 and 1808, when Congress outlawed the Atlantic slave trade.) “These are huge numbers, given the fact that people don’t think this is going on,” Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told NBC News earlier this year.

The victims are mostly women who have been tricked into bondage, ironically often by people who immigrated here from their own homelands. Most female Asian slaves are forced into prostitution rings, serving metropolitan areas with large Asian communities, says Dr. Laura J. Lederer, who directs the Protection Project and has interviewed 50 trafficking victims. Most Latin American slaves are required to work in the fields, while those from the Middle East or Africa are, like Christi Elangwe, trapped as domestic workers in affluent homes. Whatever lot they draw, they all share the two defining traits of slavery through the ages: they are not paid and they cannot leave.

President Bill Clinton’s five-year-old Inter-Agency Council on Women puts the value of the global slave trade at some $9 billion. “It’s incredibly lucrative,” says council director Theresa Loar. “It’s the fastest-growing criminal enterprise, behind guns and drugs, in this country.”

The situation is so serious that in October, the U.N. Crime Commission met in Vienna to draft an international treaty to combat human trafficking worldwide. The treaty contains the first international definition of “trafficking in persons,” recognizing that psychological coercion–and not just the use of force–is now one of the main tools of traffickers. The United States followed suit: on Oct. 28, Clinton signed a bill that gives temporary asylum to the slaves and makes life in prison a possible penalty for the enslavers. “Every year… women, children and men are forced or tricked into lives of utter misery,” Clinton said in his weekly radio address later that morning. “This is slavery, plain and simple.”

In just the past few months, a rash of slavery cases have reached the U.S. courts. In October, the Justice Department indicted one of Berkeley, Calif.’s largest landowners, Lakireddy Bali Reddy (and other family members, all of whom have pleaded not guilty), on charges he lured a dozen women from India with the promise of jobs but had “immoral” sexual relations with them and had them work, unpaid, as maids in his many buildings instead. Texas prosecutors got guilty pleas last August in a case where 100 Chinese and Thai women were agreeing to pay $40,000 apiece to sneak into America every month, only to find themselves pressed into the flesh trade in Houston. A few days later, Rene R. Bonetti–a satellite engineer from Gaithersburg, Md.–was sentenced to 6i years for trapping a Brazilian maid in his home, with no pay and insufficient food, for 20 years. Hilda Rosa Dos Santos testified that Bonetti’s wife, Margarida Bonetti, burned and beat her, and that Mr. Bonetti padlocked the refrigerator. By the time neighbors realized Dos Santos was in jeopardy, she had a festering gash on one leg and an untreated tumor in her stomach the size of a soccer ball. Mrs. Bonetti fled the United States to her native Brazil after she was indicted on charges of abuse. Mr. Bonetti has appealed.

The most-high-profile case will reach a federal jury next month, when Little Rock, Ark., businessman David Jewell Jones–an appointee of the then Governor Clinton’s and a friend of former senator David Pryor’s–is scheduled to stand trial on charges that he twice deputized confederates to go to Guangdong province on the South China Sea, propose marriage to a woman and deliver her to him upon their return, “for the purpose of maintaining a sexual relationship,” according to the Justice Department. The women, Yu Ho Zhong, now 35, and Xiao Ying Wu, 38, ultimately went to U.S. officials with their stories, which Jones’s attorney calls “garbage.” An earlier trial resulted in a hung jury.

Christi Elangwe descended into slavery by stages, beginning in 1993, when she was a sixth grader in Cameroon who wished to attend high school and one day become a nurse. Her parents had little money, however, and could not pay for school. So she did what so many other ambitious young women from her country do. In exchange for tuition, she became a live-in maid for an older woman in a distant village. She was disappointed when her employer enrolled her in a home-economics trade program, instead of regular school. Too timid to object, Elangwe stayed put anyway until she was 17, when her employer proposed a new arrangement. “She told me she has a daughter in America, and she needs somebody to come and check out with the kids, and she will send the person to school,” says Elangwe in her irregular English. “That’s what I really wanted to do, I wanted to go to school.”

But school was apparently never a real possibility. Lynne A. Battaglia, the U.S. attorney in Maryland, contends that Daniel Acha-Morfaw, a computer consultant, and his wife, Vivian Satia, a nurse (both are U.S. citizens who had emigrated from Cameroon themselves), were looking for unpaid labor to help raise their three kids, and broke laws to get it. Less than two weeks ago they were arrested and charged with harboring an alien and forcing her to work without pay. Two other families were also arrest-ed, part of a three-year-long joint investigation by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Department of State. “These are particularly sad cases,” Battaglia says. Both Acha-Morfaw and Satia plan vigorous defenses against the charges, which carry 15-year prison terms and $500,000 fines, their lawyers say.

Elangwe left Cameroon for the first time in her life in February 1995, on a flight through Paris to America. She passed through Customs smoothly, she says, fraudulently using a passport her new employers had mailed her; it belonged to a U.S. resident who barely resembled her, say her attorneys. “I was so excited,” she says. But it was immediately clear she had made a mistake.

Elangwe is quick to point out that her five years of tending to the couple and their children (now ages 12, 10 and 7) were not as hideous as they might have been. She slept on a mattress in a bedroom–alongside the youngest daughter, whom she cared for day and night. She had plenty to eat. She was never beaten. But she was in no way free. She was kept inside the town house almost continually. Often she took care of children of the couple’s friends and relatives, sometimes so many that the home resembled a day-care facility. She was never allowed to visit a physician or a dentist. Occasionally, she begged to be taken to the mall, and reluctantly, they dropped her off there for brief, lonely strolls through its bright corridors. This happened three times–in five years.

Neither Acha-Morfaw nor his wife would talk to NEWSWEEK, and their lawyers declined to comment on specific charges, except to deny any involvement in slavery. “It’s certainly nothing more sinister than” harboring an alien, says Steven D. Kupferberg, Satia’s lawyer. “This girl spoke English? She could have told somebody!”

Elangwe says she held tight to the hope that the pair would eventually loosen their grip on her. “They would say, ‘You’ve only been here for four years, you’ve only been here for five years. Five years is not enough for you to start going out or working or going to school’.” Sometimes they told her they had sent money back home to her family as payments for her labors. But this was not true, say her attorneys, who have investigated the claim.

Nobody kept a gun to Elangwe’s head. Instead of using shackles, Elangwe’s alleged captors kept her locked up through fear. This is not unusual, as Cherif Bassiouni, who heads the International Human Rights Law Institute at DePaul University, says: “The weakest and most vulnerable can be too scared to leave.” “I believed America is no good,” Elangwe says. “[Vivian Satia] said I shouldn’t think America is easy. It’s not everybody can make it in America. It’s dangerous out there. You can get killed. You could go out there and get killed.” Steadily, the idea that she had any role in the larger world vanished entirely.

Because women in less-developed countries have suffered the bulk of the burdens of post-cold-war economic disparities, they make up the overwhelming majority of the world’s slaves. In rural areas of Thailand, a world hub in the slave trade, many girls resign themselves from a young age to work in the brothels that prop up large segments of the country’s economy. The situation is similar in parts of Latin America and Africa. In the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, where as many as two thirds of the women live in poverty, even the most spurious promises of American dreams hold a powerful allure. Poor women there are easily taken by traffickers with offers of phantom jobs as dancers, models or waitresses in America–and then pressed into slavery as prostitutes or domestics. So desperate are they for opportunities in Bulgaria, one in four women between the ages of 12 and 35 says she is likely to take a risky foreign job she sees advertised in local papers, according to a recent survey by the International Organization for Migration.

These pressures were behind an enormous Atlanta-based prostitution ring for which eight suspected Vietnamese and Chinese mob members were indicted in 1999 and are now serving federal sentences. They smuggled in nearly 1,000 women as young as 13 from China, South Korea, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia, and farmed them out into brothels in 16 states. All had agreed to repay their travel costs of $30,000 to $40,000, says Assistant U.S. Attorney Janis Gordon, and when they arrived here, prostitution was the only means offered. Their armed captors kept a ledger showing how much each woman owed and how much each was credited after every trick. A copy obtained by NEWSWEEK shows that customers were charged $100 per encounter, $30 of which went to the house. The remainder went to the traffickers. Some women were hired out more than 20 times a day. Most could not keep pace. One woman is known to have earned her freedom over the course of the syndicate’s operation, from 1995 to 1998. It took her 11 months. She gave herself the nickname Lucky.

The INS has identified 250 brothels in 26 states suspected of using unwitting immigrant women as prostitutes. But there are no similar statistics for women who are unpaid nannies in private homes, some held out of view under no more felicitous circumstances.

An intensely upbeat teenager who goes by her initials, “PB”–her true identity is guarded at the request of a Michigan judge–turned 18 a few weeks ago and celebrated with an ice-skating party for a dozen friends. It was her first birthday celebration since arriving in Farmington Hills, an upper-middle-class Detroit suburb, where she lived for four years in a concrete basement. “That’s why I chose kind of a kiddie thing, like ice skating,” she says brightly, “because I didn’t have my teenage years.”

Like Christi Elangwe, PB came to America from Cameroon with promises of an education in exchange for domestic services. What transpired was quite different. For one thing, one of her lawyers, Ronald E. Kaplovitz, suspects that PB’s father–who barters his labor for food back home–may have sold his daughter for cash. Once she arrived in America, she was virtually locked inside and hidden from sight. “We’re a Neighborhood Watch community,” says Susan Aschoff, who lives next door to the stately two-story, $260,000 home that was PB’s dungeon, “but we’re looking for strangers, not for people who are living here, not somebody living next door.” She describes Joseph Djoumessi, a 43-year-old Wayne State University law-school graduate, and his wife, Evelyn, 35, a pharmacist–both had emigrated from Cameroon–as ordinary neighbors. “It seemed like a normal home,” she says.

But Oakland County prosecutors had the pair arrested last July on charges of kidnapping and child abuse. Joseph Djoumessi is further charged with first-degree sexual assault for raping and sodomizing PB over several years, beginning one night in 1998, when he beckoned the minor into his bedroom to watch television. “The wife was at work,” PB tells NEWSWEEK in a steady, thin voice. “He did this four or five times.” She told an arraignment judge that her pain was immense. He threatened to kill her and her family if she told anyone, she recalled. Still, she does not hate him. “It’s past. It’s over. I just feel sorry he did what he did.”

The Djoumessis are in jail awaiting trials, scheduled to begin next month. Both have pleaded not guilty. The husband’s attorney, Bill Mitchell, dismisses the charges as the “silly” invention of a prosecutor in an election year, even while acknowledging that the girl was not allowed to go to school. “In essence, Mrs. Djoumessi agreed to be what amounts to a godmother–they call it ‘replacement mother’–for this young lady,” he says. “Was it a household where she was as free as most American kids? No. Does that make it kidnapping? Is this a child who was enslaved? That is ludicrous.”

PB says she came to the United States after an associate of the Djoumessis’ falsified a birth certificate and passport for the girl, naming her the illegitimate daughter of Evelyn Djoumessi, and stole her into America under a waiver meant to reunite U.S. citizens with their foreign-born children. According to what PB has told the authorities, the Djoumessis were cruel to her from the start. She slept in the basement, bathed using a bucket over a drain in the floor, and believed what they told her, that she would be arrested by American authorities if she wandered out on her own. She was made to wash and clean and feed the children, and get them to the bus, strip and wash and remake their beds, iron everything including their underwear, vacuum under the beds and mop the floors, make the dinner and clean the garage past midnight. She wrote forlorn letters to her parents, but police have since learned her alleged captors never mailed them; her parents wrote her, but the Djoumessis never delivered those letters, either, according to Betty L. Lowenthal, PB’s court-appointed attorney. She never left the house on her own. She never saw a school, which is what upsets her the most. “Here’s what he said to me: he has my life, he can do as he please with it. He can choose to send me to school. He can choose not to. I was being told that if I did tell someone, that I would go to jail.”

But the Djoumessis also screamed at her and beat her, she says. The only time she allows her own anger to spark is when she points to each of the welts that make a galaxy on her forearms. “This is one right here, this is one right here, this is one right here, this is one right here, this is one right here,” she says, touching a fingertip to each purple reminder, “from belt beatings and high-heeled-shoe beatings and stick beatings.”

Last winter, PB says, she learned that the Djoumessis planned to return her to Cameroon and bring back a replacement. The thought of somebody else’s enduring her suffering spurred her to action. “I was thinking way beyond the walls then,” she says. “I was thinking, ‘What would my future be like?’ I was picturing what I had worked for in the past to get me to the seventh grade. I looked through all that. And I was thinking, ‘Is all this going to go to waste?’ I realized they were just playing games with me. All my life I have been told, ‘Nothing will get you anywhere but your education.’ That was stuck in my head. So I was looking beyond that and I said, ‘No. This is too much to let it go to waste…’ I could not take it anymore. I felt like exploding.”

That evening, she bundled up the garbage and headed for the curb. Instead, she walked just 20 feet across the yard and asked her startled neighbors for help. Each night for the next few weeks, garbage under her arm, she unfolded her story in cautious chapters to Susan Aschoff, a 51-year-old mother of children close to PB’s age. “I was astonished,” Aschoff says. “I had no idea she lived there. If the young lady had not found her way to me, I would still be in the dark.” Shortly, Aschoff placed an anonymous telephone call to the local child protective services office. It sent police right away. Within hours, PB was in foster care and Evelyn Djoumessi was being questioned. She insisted PB was her daughter. But then an astute officer asked her when her daughter’s birthday was. She did not know it.

PB is making up for lost time with remarkable speed. She is a 10th grader now, a cheerleader and a swim-team member. If the INS permits her to apply for residency, as her attorney expects, she hopes to stay in America through college, and even dreams of becoming a country-Western singer–more than anything, she says, Shania Twain’s lyrics sustained her over the most difficult years. She offers a sample, beaming as she stretches her click-clack Cameroonian accent into a Nashville twang. Appropriately, the song begins: “Back through the years/ I go wandering once again/ Back through the seasons of my youth.”

Early this year Christi Elangwe reached a breaking point much as PB did, after her alleged captors finally capitulated and began driving her to GED classes two mornings a week. A GED was not what she had in mind. She believed she’d earned the right to attend an ordinary school with people her age. “That’s what made me come,” she says.

She told everyone in class about her circumstances. Despite what her alleged captors had warned, nothing bad happened. Instead, the grapevine carried her story to Louis Etongwe, a 45-year-old Gateway Computer employee in Newport News, Va. Etongwe, a fellow Cameroonian, runs a sort of underground railroad to help free young women from peonage as domestics. Joy Zarembka, executive director of the Campaign for Migrant Domestic Workers, calls people like him “the good Samaritans who are dismantling slavery case by case in the country.”

Etongwe called Elangwe one morning when she was home alone. “I asked her if she was safe,” he recalls. “I asked her if she needed any help.” She wouldn’t say. “I was scared,” Elangwe remembers. “At first I didn’t believe him.”

He placed more secret calls in the next month before she spilled everything. “What she told me really created a sour, bitter feeling in my mind,” says Louis Etongwe. “I couldn’t believe in this day and age someone would treat someone’s child that way. It made me so mad. I said, ‘You have to get out of that place’.” With prodding, she agreed. She made her move early on Feb. 10, after Vivian Satia dropped her off at GED classes. Instead of going in, she sneaked onto a city bus–her first solo bus ride–and rode a few blocks to the meeting place Etongwe selected.

As escapes go, it lacked crackling drama. But Elangwe was terrified nonetheless. It was the first time in five years she had defied her masters. “If you’ve ever been to a dog shelter, that’s the fear that she had when I first met her,” says her lawyer. “It was all so new to her that she had any rights at all and that she could pursue them. And that anybody in the larger world would value her as a human being.”

The INS has “paroled” her into the United States to pursue criminal litigation, and on Nov. 20, Elangwe filed a civil suit against the couple, charging they violated the 13th Amendment of the Constitution prohibiting slavery. She seeks more than $1 million in back wages and punitive damages. She may be allowed to stay here at least through her civil suit, Smitson says, but that’s not the reason they filed it. “I see it as a reaffirmation of her value as a human being.”

Elangwe is somewhat more focused on the practical than that. “I’m trying to save,” she says with a smile. “I still have to go to school.”

source:http://www.newsweek.com/id/104931/output/print

Published in: on November 14, 2009 at 10:15 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,

Full House OKs ban on indoor prostitution

ZaDjCFPDRCMglVL-250
The House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill to outlaw indoor prostitution Wednesday night, paving the way for a final debate on the Senate floor Thursday.

The bill’s passage followed an hour of impassioned debate from both sides of the issue. Supporters said the bill would provide the police with the tools they need to conduct sting operations at brothels where, they said, pimps and sex-traffickers degrade and enslave women and children. Opponents argued that it would harm vulnerable women, drive prostitution underground and cost the financially strapped state more money by sending women to prison. .

The bill represents a compromise between the House and Senate that even some supporters said was a less-than-ideal outcome of a contentious effort to close a nearly 30-year-old loophole in the state’s prostitution law.

Prostitutes who work in brothels or out of their homes would face the same criminal misdemeanor charges as prostitutes who work the street. However, the bill would empower judges to erase any record of charges for convicted prostitutes after one year.

“It’s not a perfect bill,” said Rep. Donald J. Lally Jr., D-Narragansett, “but I believe it’s the best bill we can have at this time.”

The Senate bill was sponsored by Sen. Paul A. Jabour, D-Providence; the House bill’s sponsor is Rep. Joanne M. Giannini, D-Providence.

“This wasn’t done to hurt the women,” Giannini said on the House floor. “This was done to help the victims.”

But some members adamantly disagreed.

“To imprison women because this is the only means they know to survive is shameful,” said Rep. Anastasia P. Williams, D-Providence. “There are real solutions to this problem, but unfortunately they are not in this bill today.”

Rep. Peter Kilmartin, D-Pawtucket, a former police officer, struck back, saying that women are being “imported into the state” to work as prostitutes.

“If you want to protect women,” he said, his voice rising, “you pass this law!”

Rep. Alfred A. Gemma, D-Warwick, argued that trying to outlaw indoor prostitution was similar to attempting to ban alcohol consumption in the days of speakeasies.

“This is trying to regulate morality,” he said.

Rep. Rodney D. Driver, D-Richmond, tried unsuccessfully to amend the prostitution bill to postpone enforcement until July 1, 2010, to allow the women who work as prostitutes and their landlords more time to prepare, saying “they’re not breaking the law at the present.” (The bill, as currently worded, would be effective on passage.)

The bill passed by a vote of 58-9. (Eight members, including some who spoke against the bill, did not vote.)

The House also passed a separate bill to strengthen the laws against human trafficking, by making trafficking of minors for sex a felony subject to 40 years in prison and a fine of up to $40,000 or both. The bill also would outlaw trafficking for forced labor. That bill, introduced by Sen. Rhoda A. Perry, D-Providence, was approved 54-0, with 21 members not voting. (An identical House bill, introduced by Giannini, is expected to be heard on the Senate floor Thursday.)

The House also unanimously approved a bill, introduced by Giannini, making it illegal for anyone under 18 to work in any capacity in clubs that offer “adult entertainment.” That bill now heads for a final vote on the Senate floor Thursday. The measure follows the discovery earlier this year of an underage girl who was dancing in a strip club.

KEY POINTS

Prostitution bill

Criminalizes indoor prostitution First offenders face up to $1,000 fine and 6 months in prison.

Charges can be erased A judge could “expunge” prostitutes’ records after 1 year.

Punishes ‘Johns’ Prostitutes and their customers face same penalties.

Punishes landlords Landlords who knowingly allow prostitution could face up to 5 years in prison and $5,000 fines.

The House vote Voting yes

Almeida, D-Providence

Azzinaro, D-Westerly

Baldelli-Hunt, D-Woonsocket

Brien, D-Woonsocket

Caprio, D-Narragansett

Carnevale, D-Providence

Carter, D-North Kingstown

Coderre, D-Pawtucket

Corvese, D-North Providence

Costantino, D-Providence

DaSilva, D-East Providence

DeSimone, D-Providence

Diaz, D-Providence

Edwards, D-Tiverton

Ehrhardt, R-North Kingstown

Fellela, D-Johnston

Fox, D-Providence

Gablinske, D-Bristol

Gallison, D-Bristol

Giannini, D-Providence

Guthrie, D-Coventry

Hearn, D-Barrington

Jackson, D-Newport

Jacquard, D-Cranston

Kennedy, D-Hopkinton

Kilmartin, D-Pawtucket

Lally, D-South Kingstown

Lima, D-Cranston

Loughlin, R-Tiverton

MacBeth, D-Cumberland

Malik, D-Warren

Marcello, D-Scituate

Martin, D-Newport

Mattiello, D-Cranston

McCauley, D-Providence

McNamara, D-Warwick

Melo, D-East Providence

Menard, D-Lincoln

Murphy, D-West Warwick

Newberry, R-N. Smithfield

O&rsquoNeill, D-Pawtucket

Pacheco, D-Burrillville

Pollard, D-Foster

A. Rice, D-Portsmouth

M. Rice, D-South Kingstown

Ruggiero, D-Jamestown

San Bento, D-Pawtucket

Savage, R-East Providence

Schadone, D-North Providence

Serpa, D-West Warwick

Silva, D-Central Falls

Sullivan, D-Coventry

Trillo, R-Warwick

Vaudreuil, D-Cumberland

Wasylyk, D-Providence

Watson, R-East Greenwich

Williamson, D-Coventry

Winfield, D-Smithfield

Voting no

Ajello, D-Providence

Driver, D-Richmond

Ferri, D-Warwick

Fierro, D-Woonsocket

Handy, D-Cranston

Petrarca, D-Lincoln

Segal, D-Providence

Walsh, D-Charlestown

Williams, D-Providence

Did not vote

Dennigan, D-East Providence

Flaherty, D-Warwick

Gemma, D-Warwick

Naughton, D-Warwick

Palumbo, D-Cranston

Shallcross Smith, D-Lincoln

Slater, D-Providence

Ucci, D-Johnston

SOURCE: House roll call

source:http://www.projo.com/generalassembly/HOUSE_PROSTITUTION_10-29-09_FDG8T13_v78.3b407aa.html

Schoolchildren given sex lessons… in what’s available at the local brothel

Prostitute
Picture posed by model showing a prostitute sitting on the edge of a bed, wearing red stockings, counting her earnings

Pupils as young as 14 are listening to a brothel owner reel off a menu of sexual services as part of lessons on sex trafficking.

At least 15 schools have hosted lessons featuring the tape recording of a madam explaining the attributes of the girls she has on offer.

Critics have condemned the tape as inappropriate for its audience of teenage boys and girls aged 14 to 17.

The recording is part of a lesson devised by campaigners who visit secondary schools and colleges to raise awareness of sex trafficking.

The 40-minute presentation usually takes place during school citizenship lessons.

One mother said her daughter had been ‘more than a little upset’ by the graphic classes, which have been given in recent weeks around Croydon, South London, said to be home to more than 50 brothels.

Pupils initially heard a first-person account from ‘Katerina’, a Romanian prostitute who told how she came to Britain after being promised a job as a waitress.

When she arrived she was taken to a flat and gang raped before being forced into prostitution.

They also heard a recording of an undercover investigator’s phone call to a brothel madam in Croydon.

The woman lists a string of services available along with prices. She also gives the vital measurements of prostitutes on offer and their ethnicity.

Staff from campaign group Croydon Community Against Trafficking came up with the lessons. One of its volunteers said Year 11 pupils were the best age for such a graphic presentation.

‘It can be difficult, boys especially have an attitude – they don’t care,’ she said.

‘Then we say what if it was you? Or your sister? Some of them are shocked to learn there is a brothel on the road they live in.’

A CCAT spokesman said: ‘We might when we are doing our lessons be talking to boys – or girls – who might in the future visit a prostitute, or consider it on their stag dos.

‘One of our main aims is to raise awareness in the community about human trafficking and particularly sexual exploitation.

‘What better place to go than into schools where young people are going to be adults in the community?’

Hugh McKinney, chairman of the National Family Campaign, said: ‘The question has to be asked if this is an appropriate topic for young boys at a vulnerable stage of development to hear in the classroom.’

source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1199420/Schoolchildren-given-sex-slave-lessons–including-graphic-recording-menu-brothel.html#ixzz0LFA6W1PH&D

For educational purposes only

Published in: on July 14, 2009 at 10:33 am  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , ,